African conversations

Insights and recommendations of African stakeholders on biocontrol technologies for malaria control

Methodology

Study Design & Research Methods

Our research employs a comprehensive mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies to capture the full spectrum of stakeholder perspectives on gene drive technologies.

3
Research Phases

Structured approach

8+
Data Collection Methods

Comprehensive toolset

Research Methods

Researchers planning methodology for stakeholder engagement

Framework

Research Methodology

A structured approach to ensure comprehensive and rigorous data collection and analysis across multiple African contexts and stakeholder groups

Phase 1: Exploratory Research

Initial quantitative surveys and needs assessment to map stakeholder landscape and identify key areas for in-depth investigation.

6-8 Months 385 Participants

Phase 2: In-Depth Investigation

Qualitative interviews, focus groups, and field observations to gain deep insights into stakeholder perspectives and concerns.

10-12 Months 120+ Interviews

Phase 3: Analysis & Synthesis

Comprehensive data analysis, triangulation of findings, and development of recommendations and stakeholder engagement frameworks.

4-6 Months 25+ Reports

Quantitative Methods

Structured data collection and analysis methods to gather measurable information:

  • Structured surveys

    Distributed electronically and on paper to diverse stakeholder groups across 8 countries

  • Statistical analysis

    Using SPSS and R to identify patterns and correlations in stakeholder responses

  • Demographic mapping

    To ensure representation across gender, age, education levels, and geographic regions

  • Trend analysis

    Identification of patterns across geographic regions and time periods in stakeholder attitudes

Qualitative Methods

In-depth exploratory approaches to understand context, meanings, and perspectives:

  • In-depth interviews

    One-on-one conversations with key stakeholders and opinion leaders in multiple countries

  • Focus group discussions

    Facilitated group conversations with communities and stakeholder groups to capture diverse perspectives

  • Thematic analysis

    Using NVivo software to identify recurring themes and narratives across stakeholder accounts

  • Case studies

    In-depth analysis of specific contextual scenarios across different regions and cultural contexts

Participants

Stakeholder Categories

Our research engaged with diverse stakeholder groups across multiple African countries to ensure comprehensive perspectives

Community Members

Residents of malaria-endemic regions who would be directly affected by vector control interventions, including local leaders, women's groups, and youth.

150+ Participants 8 Countries

Health Professionals

Medical practitioners, public health officials, disease control program managers, and healthcare workers involved in malaria prevention and treatment.

80+ Participants 7 Countries

Researchers & Academics

Scientists, ethicists, social scientists, and academic experts in vector biology, public health, bioethics, and related disciplines.

60+ Participants 12 Institutions

Policy Makers

Government officials, regulators, policy advisors, and legislative representatives responsible for public health policy and biotechnology regulation.

40+ Participants 6 Countries

Civil Society Organizations

Non-governmental organizations, advocacy groups, and civil society representatives focused on health, environment, and development issues.

30+ Organizations Regional Focus

Media & Communication

Journalists, science communicators, and media professionals who play a key role in public information dissemination and opinion formation.

25+ Participants 4 Countries

Access Our Research Findings

Explore our comprehensive reports, publications, and resources based on this extensive research methodology